![]() PREV |
RANT FROM OCTOBER 2000 "The Myth of Secrecy" |
![]() NEXT |
---|
The recriminations and breast-beating over the bungled Wen Ho Lee case should instigate even deeper re-evaluation of the aims and desires of the government of the U.S. The phrase "national security" needs to be examined very carefully and not used any longer as a curtain behind which mindless blundering and evil machinations can be hidden. The know-how involved in the making and delivering of nuclear weapons should have been turned over to the United Nations in 1945 and the use of such terrorist weapons renounced sincerely, as detrimental to the security of the land and people of this country and all countries. The plan was proposed then, and rejected by the U.S. government, without consulting the people themselves. The result was the Cold War, with all the threatening postures, and all the "police actions," which seriously menaced the security of every man, woman and child on the planet. Secrecy was imposed on the horrific weaponry, and the general population lived lives of remarkably quiet desperation, because they didn't know and didn't really want to know what was actually going on, how dangerous it was, how much suffering and death was being unleashed and stored up to be unleashed later. Secrecy became part of the myth of the time. Spy novels, spy movies and real-life executions of supposed spies became common. We became so used to spying and lying about spying, that the idea of secrecy itself became something no one dared question. The notion of our side's moral superiority was taken quite for granted, even though the facts of the case made such a notion utterly absurd. Who is morally superior? LBJ? Nixon? Reagan? Clinton? Our side could do dastardly deeds, we thought, because the other side did and we were the good ones, in the struggle of good against evil. Now that the Cold War is over, and the Wen Ho Lee case is out into the open, with the U.S. government badly humiliated in the process, it is time to question the very idea of secrecy. What needs to be kept secret? From whom? There is no such thing as secrecy which is really secret anyway. The enemies know. The Sandinistas knew that the U.S. was supplying the Somocistas directly, and let the world know by shooting down an American civilian piloting a supply plane. The Soviets knew that the U.S. was spying on their country by high altitude fly-overs, and when Ike denied it, they shot one down and displayed the marvelous U-2 technology and the pilot to all the world. "There is nothing secret that shall not be made known." For decades the real purpose of secrecy has been to hide things from the American people. Someone needs to hide the fact of how much waste there really is, and how lethal it is. Someone needs to hide the blunders and misdeeds of government officials. They need to hide the truth about how dangerous they themselves have made the world -- not rogue states like Libya, but rogue policies of bombing civilians and calling it "collateral damage," and rogue pollution in our own suburbs, and calling things like plutonium "safe." The Rocky Flats jury was enjoined to secrecy by the judge, not to protect weapons know-how, but to prevent the people of Denver from finding out how bad the danger they are in really is, which could cause panic and then a demand for change. The government's frantic overstatements about how dangerous Wen Ho Lee was to the security of the U.S. were an attempt to preserve secrecy, and the very idea of secrecy itself. But it no longer works. Any hacker can download anything. "There is nothing secret that shall not be made known." Aware citizens of the world do not fear the rogue states as much as they fear the massive military power of the U.S. The U.S. military budget is larger than those of the next ten largest taken together. Security, for us and for all, will come when that is drastically changed, that is, reduced. Security will only come when everyone knows everything. Fresh air truth will do more good, for us and for all, than all the frantic and futile attempts to reinstall secrecy, reclassifying everything, and pretending that that makes us safer. The truth, that all people everywhere need to know, is that the situation is dire. Serious problems need serious attention, but if we all work together on what really could be solutions, instead of hiding so much of our ingenuity from others and calling that "science," maybe we can stumble on some workable plans, and find the courage to do what needs to be done. * * * |
![]() |
![]() |
Harry's Rants | ![]() |
![]() |
---|